— Evidence, not marketing
We publish this page as evidence, not marketing copy — including the things that didn't work. Seven ventures we evaluated and archived appear in our own public record precisely because that discipline is part of the case for trusting the seventeen we kept building.
Figures below are placeholders pending the live metrics feed described in the engineering note near the bottom of this page — shown as "—" rather than a fabricated number, per our own integrity policy.
Seven. Each was evaluated, built or scoped, and then killed by our own review — with the reason recorded at the time, not written afterwards. They are listed here because a portfolio that only ever shows its survivors is not showing you its judgement.
| Venture | What it was | Why we stopped |
|---|---|---|
| Meridian | IP-portfolio tooling | Pivoted to a low-ceiling SaaS with no strategic asset. We would reverse the pivot if a real IP asset emerged. |
| Coulomb | Home tDCS therapeutic | Pivoted from a therapeutic to niche research SaaS — a boring pivot that kept the plumbing and dropped the science. |
| Tessera | Pharmacogenomic reporting | Redundant with Ladder, which surfaces the same genetics at the point of prescribing instead of in a separate report. |
| Kelp | Microbiome research data commons | Small market, unclear moat. Reopen if a landmark causal microbiome–ADHD study lands. |
| Clarify | Clinical documentation assistant | Structural: a feature, not a platform. Ambient scribes will absorb the workflow. |
| Omega-3 | Direct-to-consumer supplementation | No defensible moat against commodity generics. |
| VR Assessment | Virtual-reality cognitive assessment | The cognitive-training transfer problem is a scientific wall. Akili spent $500M+ establishing that digital therapeutics for ADHD lack a business model; we did not need to repeat it. |
An eighth venture, Titrately, is not counted here: it was renamed and rebuilt as Ladder, not stopped. Ladder's first migration still creates the database roles under Titrately's name, which is how directly one became the other.
A donor roll (opt-in — anonymity honored on request) and a per-fund
breakdown of restricted-fund utilization against the milestone plan will
populate here once the donor CRM is live. Until then, the quarterly
draw-down of the founder's own endowment against the milestone table in
PRODUCTION_COMPLETION_PLAN.md §10.1 is the first entry in this
ledger, by design — the founder's money is held to the same
accountability standard external donors will expect.
The first annual transparency report (finances by fund, study readouts including negatives, security-posture summary) is scheduled for publication once Wave 1 has been live for a full reporting cycle. Engineering and security gate reports for each venture will be linked here individually as they're finalized for public release.
No reports are published yet — this section will list them by date and venture once available.